Get Zevac Cross Compression

FREE Passes for PAH Members: Conference Agenda Now Out for 2025 PPIM – The 37th International Pipeline Pigging and Integrity Management Conference will take place in Houston on January 27-January 30, 2025

This Event Reminder is Sponsored by:

We Save Major Industry Dates We put up event reminders as a courtesy of the Non-Profit and Trade Organizations we support.

THE 37th INTERNATIONAL Pipeline Pigging & Integrity Management Conference™ plus Training Courses and Exhibition
Located at George R. Brown Convention Center and the Hilton Americas1001 Avenida De Las Americas, Houston, TX 77010

COURSES
January 27-28

CONFERENCE
January 29-31

EXHIBITION hours
Tuesday, January 28
5:00pm-7:00pm Opening reception, Exhibition open
5:00pm-7:00pm Reception, Exhibition open

Wednesday, January 29
9:00am-7:00pm Exhibition open

Thursday, January 30
9:00am-2:00pm Exhibition open

PPIM : The industry forum devoted exclusively to pigging for pipeline maintenance and inspection, engineering assessment, repair, risk management and NDE.

Discover the Pipeline Pigging and Integrity Management Show
Are you invested in the operation and maintenance of pipelines? Do you want to stay up to date with the latest advancements in pipeline pigging and integrity management? Look no further than the Pipeline Pigging and Integrity Management Show 2025, the premier event for professionals in the pipeline industry. Here we will explore what this show is all about and what you can expect when attending.

About the Show:
The Pipeline Pigging and Integrity Management Show is an annual event that brings together industry experts, professionals, and organizations who are passionate about pipeline maintenance and safety. This show serves as a platform for showcasing and discussing innovative technologies, best practices, and solutions related to pipeline pigging and integrity management.

What to Expect:
When attending the show, you can expect to be immersed in a world of knowledge and cutting-edge advancements. Educational sessions, presentations, and exhibitions will provide you with the opportunity to learn about the latest trends and developments in pipeline pigging and integrity management. Discover state-of-the-art equipment, services, and software that are designed to enhance pipeline maintenance and safety.

Networking Opportunities:
The Pipeline Pigging and Integrity Management Show goes beyond just educational sessions and exhibitions. It also fosters networking among industry experts, allowing for valuable knowledge sharing and collaboration. Connect with like-minded professionals, exchange ideas, and build relationships in a supportive and collaborative environment.

See You There:
The Pipeline Pigging and Integrity Management Show is a must-attend event for professionals involved in the operation and maintenance of pipelines. By participating in this show, you will gain valuable insights into the latest advancements in pipeline pigging and integrity management. Take advantage of the educational sessions, exhibitions, and networking opportunities to enhance your knowledge and expand your professional network. Mark your calendars and don’t miss out on this incredible opportunity to propel your career forward in the pipeline industry.

If you are looking to know more about the 2025 PPIM, here is the agenda for the upcoming conference.

If you are a Pipeliners Association of Houston Member, you can click the “Register” Button
to be routed to the link for Free Expo Passes

Tuesday & Wednesday

7:00 Breakfast sponsored by Inline
7:00 Registration open
1.0 Plenary – Opening Session sponsored by NDT Global
8:00 Opening remarks
8:15 215 State of Integrity 2025 – Sheri Bacoum, OneBridge Solutions, Inc., Durango, USA
8:45 Young Pipeline Professional Annual Recognition Award Presentation
9:00 217 Managing the Pipe Body Hard Spots Integrity Threat
Michael Rosenfeld, Bill Amend, Simon Slater
RSI Pipeline Solutions, New Albany, USA, ROSEN Group, Columbus, USA
9:30 167 Practical Challenges of Using the RP 1183 Shape Parameter Methods
Rhett Dotson, Brian Leis
Integrity, Houston, USA; N Leis, Consultant, Inc., Columbus, USA
10:00 Refreshment Break
11:00 179 The Sky Is Not Falling — Mechanical Damage Can Be Assessed Appropriately
Amro Rana, Sanjay Tiku, Al Rostaoei, Behrooz Sharif, Vlado Semiga, Aaron Dinwittzer, Munendra Tomar, Yohan Miglis, Mark Piazza
Enbridge, Ottawa, Canada; ADM Consulting, Ottawa, Canada; TC Energy, Houston, USA; Kinder Morgan, Houston, USA; American Petroleum Institute, Washington DC, USA
11:30 280 Lessons Learned Using API 1163 for Metal-Loss ILI
Tom Bubbenk, Matt Ellinger
DNV, Dublin, USA
12:00 161 Leveraging Destructive Testing to Enhance Detection and Identification of Complex Cracking in LF-ERW: Case Study Phase II
Christopher Newton, Jordi Aymerich, Sayan Pipattan, Tania Haro, Santiago Urrea, Alex Hersley
Phillips 66, Houston, USA; NDT Global, Calgary, Canada; NDT Global, Stutensee, Germany; NDT Global, Houston, USA
12:30 Lunch sponsored by ENDURO
14:00 – 15:00 Room A: 295 Highlighting the Threat of Circumferential Stress Corrosion Cracking (CSCC) with Advanced In-Line Inspection Tools
Matt Monberg, Jonathan Hardy, Dane Butler, TD Williamson, Houston, USA
Room B: 176 Development and Implementation of a Compact 36-Inch Combination Ultrasonic ILI Tool for Enhanced Pipeline Integrity
Nathan Leslie, Jake Hoase, Jonas Butterer
NDT Global, Houston, USA; Colonial Pipeline Company, Alpharetta, USA; NDT Global, Stutensee, Germany
Room C: 261 Identification of Factors to Determine Statistically Appropriate and Conservative CVN Toughness Values for Transmission Pipelines
Brett Davis, Brian Patrick, Lily Wang, Heather Watson, Reid Tait
Pacific Gas & Electric Company, San Ramon, USA; Exponent, Inc., Philadelphia, USA
Room D: 271 A Case Study of a Riverbank and Riverbed Armoring and Regarding Geohazard Remediation
Eric Jenkins, Stella Cunha
Tetra Tech, Denver, USA; Enbridge, Calgary, Canada
14:30 Room A: 288 Detection and Sizing of SCC in Seam Welds of Pipelines with ILI/EMAT Advanced Ultrasonic Imaging
Niels Rodrigto
Applus-RTD, Rotterdam, Netherlands
Room B: 229 Overcoming Operational Obstacles: A Collaborative Approach to In-Line Inspection of a Unique Mexican Gas Pipeline
McKenzie Kissel, Keila Cariadd, Aaron Scharitz, Neil Short, Ricardo Vazquez, Pu Gong, Stephen Westwood
TC Energy, Mexico City, Mexico; TC Energy, Calgary, Canada
Room C: 297 Temperature to Support Fully Baking Pipeline FCS Crack Initiative
Fan Zhang
Phillips 66, Houston, USA
Room D: 182 Axial Strain Evaluation and Integration into Geohazard Management Programs
Jeff Hafer, Sylvain Cornu
Marathon Pipe Line, USA; NDT Global, Stutensee, Germany
15:00 Refreshment Break
Afternoon Sessions:
16:30 Room A: 245 Compression Sleeves – A Pragmatic Approach to Managing Design Variables and Constraints
Atul Gangotir, Ahmed Hosaini, Matt Jouhani
ADV Integrity Inc., Magnolia, USA; Bechel Energy, Houston, USA
Room B: 220 Leveraging Validation Data to Improve ILI Performance for SSCC
Christopher Davies, Johannes Spille, Simon Slater
ROSEN Group, Houston, USA
Room C: 140 Remaining Life Assessment of Hydrogen Pipelines for Flaw Sizes Below ILI and NDE Detection Limits
Zahra Lotfoll, Michel Brongers
Kiefner and Associates Inc., Houston, USA; Kiefner and Associates Inc., Columbus, USA
Room D: 106 Guided Wave Quantitative Contact Corrosion Measurement
Rhett O’Brian
GUL Americas, Houston, USA
17:30 Conference Day 1 concludes
17:30 Reception sponsored by Intero

Thursday

7:00 Breakfast
7:00 Registration open
Morning Sessions
8:00 Room A: 200 Probabilistic Assessment of Cracked Seam Welds: Advanced Insights Revealed Through Case Studies
Benjamin Novak, Therese Jensen
Enbridge, Integrity Engineering, Edmonton, CanadaRoom B: 213 Four Plans Are Costing More
Simon Roberts, Christopher Powers
ROSEN Group, Houston, USA; Williams Gulf Coast, Katy, USARoom C: 220 Addressing Dents in Pipelines: Where Are Industry Standards Lacking?
Michael Kubelka, Arvind Tiwari
TC Energy, Toronto, CanadaRoom D: 299 Stress Relief Cracking Phenomena in Welded Components of Pipelines
Amir Ahour, Randall Palermo
Enbridge, Calgary, Canada
8:30 Room A: 225 EMAT Technology for Crack Detection in Gas Pipelines
Thomas Rinker, Rakesh Rao
ROSEN Group, USARoom B: 294 Minimum Requirements for Tools in Heavy Seam Weld Discovery
Smith Associates, Fairfax, USARoom C: 244 Creating Dent Strain Maps for Integrity Verification
Hangit Fu, Joy Winston
ROSEN Group, Calgary, CanadaRoom D: 259 Multi-Dimensional Analysis Frameworks
Randall Shehan
Enbridge, Calgary, Canada
9:00 Room A: 187 Exam Grades MP Elevations in High-Pressure Pipelines
Xavier Grant
Imperial Oil, Calgary, CanadaRoom B: 234 Integrity Work Assessments and Pipeline Planning
David Spencer, Tom Gilmat
SafetyNet Integrities, Houston, USARoom C: 290 Simulation Techniques in Pipeline Dent Assessment
Gerald Phillips
API Dynamics, USARoom D: Insights into Geohazard Mapping Frameworks
Steven Crosby
Calgary, Canada
9:30 Refreshment Break
10:30 Room A: 295 Validating Crack Inspection in Welds
Tom Bubbenk, Matt Ellinger
DNV, Dublin, USARoom B: 136 Lifespan Planning for Pipeline Integrity
Thomas Bergman, Neil Gibbs
TD Williamson, USARoom C: 290 Simulation Methodology for Assessing Weld Stress
Colin Farrell, Guillermo Patel
API Dynamics, Calgary, CanadaRoom D: 111 Subsea Imaging and Detection Accuracy Studies
Apollo Ventures, Norway
11:00 Room A: 117 API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 Fatigue Analysis for Pipeline Cracks
Samuel Carter, Greg Milton
Integrity Partners, Houston, USARoom B: 218 Managing Subsea Cracks for Pipeline Safety
Sarah Collins, Adrian Wright
Integrity Systems, AustraliaRoom C: 266 Advanced Dent Assessment Methodologies
Murtaza Karam, Annette George
TransCanada Pipelines, USARoom D: 228 Seamless Subsea Mapping Algorithms
Peter Glenwright
HydroMaritime, Canada
12:00 Lunch
13:30 Room A: 142 Lessons Learned from Stress Corrosion Pipeline Challenges
Robert Smith
Pipeline Integrity, Alberta, CanadaRoom B: 239 Predictive GIS Monitoring for Hot Zones
Rafael Villas
Integrity HoustonRoom C: 241 Inspection Strategies for Pipeline Rehabilitation
Margaret Foster
Technical Integrity Services, USARoom D: 177 Risk Modelling for Pipeline Rehabilitation Programs
Alex Schneider
Enbridge, Canada
14:00 Room A: 293 Repair-by-Repair Lessons for Pipeline Seam Cracks
David Russell, Susan Moran
Williams Energy, Dallas, USARoom B: 285 Comparative Study of CRAs and Failure Modes
Adam Joseph, Ryan Keyes
Steel Tech Solutions, Ontario, USARoom C: 156 Advanced Tools for High-Pressure Pipeline Repairs
M.L. Hudson
Energy FlowCaps, Houston, USARoom D: 198 3D Imaging-Based Condition Assessments for Pipelines
Arnold Fitzgerald
Matt Research xSolutions
15:30 Refreshment Break
16:30 Room A: 164 Can AI Lead in Fatigue-Life Estimation of Flexible Pipelines?
Russell Clark
Advanced FPS Services Inc., USARoom B: 257 Deepwater Testing of High-Pressure Guided Stress Tools
Rafael Villager, Thomas Gordon
Offshore Projects, USARoom C: 140 Strength Modeling Techniques for Extreme Pipeline Conditions
Emily Norris
Houston Dynamics, USARoom D: 198 Unique AI-Based Continuous Training Advances
Patrick Turner
Enbridge, Calgary, Canada
17:00 Conference Day 2 concludes

Friday

7:00 Breakfast
7:00 Registration open
8:00 Room A: 209 Gaining a Better Understanding of Hard Spot Threats: Summary of Findings From a Joint Industry Research Initiative
Carlos Diaz, Rick Desaulniers
ENTEGRA, Indianapolis, USARoom B: 252 Inspect the Unexpected: An Iterative Approach to Developing the Only NPS 4 1.5D Triaxial MFL Combo Tool
William Deschamps-Robertson, McKenzie Kissel
Onstream Pipeline Inspection, Calgary, CanadaRoom C: 279 The Benefits of ILI Signal Review Analyses in ILI Run-to-Run Comparisons — A Case Study
Matt Ellinger, Andy Li, Stacy Hickey, Adriana Nenci, Pam Moreno, Ben Ross, Shanshan Wu
DNV, Dublin, USA; Plains Midstream Canada, Calgary, Canada; DNV, Houston, USARoom D: 231 Complementary ILI Data-Driven Analysis to Identify the Interaction of Pipe Geohazards in Colombia’s Specific Geomorphological Conditions
Lautaro Garin, David Classen, Oscar Gudinoan, Jaime Aristobat, Edwin Moreno
Baker Hughes, Houston, USA; CENIT, Bogota, Colombia
8:30 Room A: 248 How Hard are Your Hard Spots? A Deep-Dive into the Subjective Nature of Hardness Measurements
Atul Gangopty, Emmanuel Valencia, Debartha Bag
ADV Integrity Inc., Magnolia, USA; Enbridge, Houston, USARoom B: 154 High-resolution Acoustic ILI: Introducing Triple-threat Detection and Sizing in a Single Pass
Greer Simpson, Corey Richards, Carlos Costa, Aaron Schwing, Jeremy Hollifield, Jason Moritz
DarkVision Technologies, North Vancouver, Canada; Flint Hills Resources, Wichita, USARoom C: 205 Identifying and Characterizing Corrosion Morphologies More Effectively with Tri-Axial MFL Signal Analysis
Anthony Tindall, David Classen
Baker Hughes, Houston, USARoom D: 166 Assessing Landslide Risk to Pipeline Installed by Horizontal Directional Drilling Using Inertial Measurements and Data
Joel Van Hove, Owen Bunce, Peter Dowling, Peter Barlow
BGC Engineering, Vancouver, Canada; Enbridge, Calgary, Canada
9:00 Room A: 278 Development of a High-Resolution Hard Spot Specification for Reliable Inline Inspection and Threat Management
Cassidy Ryan, David Classen, Steve Farris, Oleg Shkarin, Austin Janousek
Baker Hughes, Houston, USA; Enbridge, Houston, USARoom B: 263 Leveling up Axial Crack Evaluation with High-Resolution Acoustic Imaging
Greer Simpson, Corey Richards
DarkVision Technologies, North Vancouver, CanadaRoom C: 275 Methods for Consideration of ILI Measurement Tolerance
Benjamin Mitchell, Terry DeLong, Matthew Nicholson, Brian Jimenez, Robert Zumd
Dynamic Risk, Houston, USA; Enbridge, Calgary, CanadaRoom D: 148 Assessing Pipeline Geohazard Impact on Terrain-Based Failure Models
Krishnanandukar, Ryan Milligan, Ravi Krishnamurthy
Blade Energy Partners, Houston, USA
9:30 Room A: 256 The Development of Hard Spot ILI in an Era of Change
Jason Edwards, Simon Slater, Ann Reo, Susan Moran
ROSEN Group, Houston, USA; Williams, Tulsa, USARoom B: 109 Challenging ILI for SOUR Gas Service Pipelines
Mussab Al-Nammi, Khalaf Al-Anazi, Mohammad Al-Rabeah
Saudi Aramco, Dhahran, Saudi ArabiaRoom C: 183 The Value and Science Behind MDS Pro Assessment Techniques
Dane Burden, Adrian Belanger, Ron Lundstrom, Miguel Maldonado
T.D. Williamson, Salt Lake City, USARoom D: 108 Monitoring Pipeline Movement Using Magnetics-Based Technology: A Comparative Case Study
Mehdi Lahoubi, Hamza Kella Benanni
Skipper NDT, Paris, France; Enbridge, Houston, USA
10:00 Refreshment Break
10:30 Room A: 175 Trap Safety — Awareness of Normalization of Deviation
Alan Morton, Jim Kay, Dick Williamson
R.B. Williamson Energy Advisors, Tulsa, USARoom B: 254 Improvement of ILI Sizing Accuracy for Problematic Corrosion Profiles
Pablo Cazeneuve, Katrina Jimenez, Ravi Krishnamurthy
Blade Energy Partners, Houston, USARoom C: 178 Don’t Make Your Untaggable Pipeline Unpiggable
Ken Maxfield, Jeffrey Knighton, Phil Tisovec
ExxonMobil, Baton Rouge, USARoom D: 292 An Identity Crisis: The Impact of Manufactured Bends in Bending Strain Assessments
Rhett Dotson, Alex Brown, Justin Taylor
Integrity, Houston, USA
11:00 Room A: 110 Integrity Management Operations for Gas Operators in the Context of the EPA’s New Super-Emitter Program
Douglas Sahm
ZEVAC, Tulsa, USARoom B: 224 Managing Internal Corrosion Threat in Unpiggable Pipeline and Facility Deadlegs
Leslie Ward
Kiefner and Associates, Inc., Houston, USARoom C: 195 Bi-Directional Techtethered EMAT In-Line Inspections: A Case Study
Travis Cast, Neil DeVettern
Quest Integrity, Calgary, CanadaRoom D: 227 A Novel Method for Geospatially Mapping and Integrating ILI Bending Strain Data to Optimize Geohazard Threat Detection
Sarah Newton, Caroline Scheerval
BGC Engineering, USA
11:30 Room A: 162 Hide and Seek — The Games Pigs Play
Alan Morton, Larry Alspaugh, Dick Williamson
R.B. Williamson Energy Advisors, Tulsa, USARoom B: 168 Anomalous Weld Identification: Applying a Principal Component Analysis to Magnetic Flux Data Captured by Free-Floating ILI Tools
Mike Byington, Anouk van Pol, John van Pol
INGU Solutions, Houston, USARoom C: 122 Landslide Susceptibility Maps for Pipeline Geohazard Assessments
Patricia Verde
Geosynthetics Consultants, Canada
12:00 Conference concludes